Decision Assurance

Decision Assurance

Decision evidence

Decision evidence concerns the basis of a specific consequential organisational act, not merely the event that followed it.

Maintained by VeriscopicLast reviewed 2026-09-24

The complete question

A reviewer needs to understand what evidence was available, what was relied upon, what authority applied, which governing conditions were in force, what systems contributed, what human judgement was exercised and what the organisation committed to.

A recorded action is not necessarily a reviewable decision.

Elements of a reviewable decision-state

Point-in-time evidence

Evidence captured at, or demonstrably applicable to, the execution boundary.

Business authority

The role, mandate or delegated authority that could approve, override or commit.

Human judgement

Reasoning, review, exception handling or override that materially shaped the act.

System contribution

Rules, models, workflows or external systems that materially influenced the act.

Organisational commitment

The financial, contractual, customer or operational consequence accepted by the organisation.

Replay path

A clear route through the package that lets an independent reviewer follow the decision.

Useful distinctions

Decision context should distinguish evidence that was available, relied upon, excluded or superseded. Evidence integrity covers references, hashes, signatures and declared provenance where available; not every source must already be cryptographically signed.

Runtime records can show what a system did. Governance evidence can show how an organisation is controlled. Decision evidence connects those inputs to the organisational commitment.

Continue