Source
System, standard, version and issuer.
Implementation guide
A decision-evidence record should be able to carry useful evidence from many sources without forcing each source to abandon its native format.
Definition
Decision assurance interoperability is the ability to link native evidence, provenance, applicability and limitations around one consequential organisational act.
Reference model
Decision assurance
Decision evidence
VES decision envelope
Evidence objects
Independent review
The envelope can link model output, runtime records, policy versions, authority records, claims documents, human rationale, external data and approvals while preserving each source's declared limits.
Insurance example
A claims Decision Envelope can reference a runtime receipt, policy excerpt, signed document, authority record, external data source and human review while preserving each source's own semantics.
Evidence map
A runtime receipt, claims document, external data source or model record should retain its native identity. The decision envelope adds the context required to review its relationship to the decision.
System, standard, version and issuer.
When and where the evidence applied.
Relied upon, governed by, produced by or contextual.
What the object does not establish.
Interoperability matters most when a decision crosses carriers, MGAs, brokers, vendors or external data providers. The package gives each participant a common review boundary without demanding one stack.
The VES connection
VES 1.2 supplies the wrapper and relationship model. It does not require evidence to originate inside Veriscopic or become a proprietary replacement format.
Read VES 1.2 for the published Decision Envelope, Evidence Object and verification model.
Boundary
Interoperability does not imply semantic equivalence or automatic trust between sources. Each Evidence Object remains subject to its declared provenance, conformance and limitations.
Decision assurance interoperability is the ability to link native evidence, provenance, applicability and limitations around one consequential organisational act.
Interoperability does not imply semantic equivalence or automatic trust between sources. Each Evidence Object remains subject to its declared provenance, conformance and limitations.